Internal audit and accounting

A finding that cannot show its evidence is not a finding.

The value of an audit output lies in its traceability, not in the force of its assertion. The audit layer of POLİÇEK binds every finding to the data it came from and the sentence in the document; where it cannot bind, it does not produce the finding.

The question you ask

“Where is the record behind this finding, and what does the amount rest on?”

Check your policy Try it on one of your decisions

No account yet? POLİÇEK accounts are opened by invitation. Request access

No finding without evidence. The decision is yours.

What you can do

Data and operations import
Operational findings
Cockpit
Case queue
Executive summary

A figure detached from its source cannot be defended.

A figure in an executive summary must be traceable down to the line beneath it. Certainty gained in the presentation layer is credibility lost in the audit report. That is why a figure here appears only on an evidenced line.

Internal auditors and accountants

What you can do

Data and operations import
Audit data is taken in under control; missing or inconsistent fields are stated on screen. A finding produced from insufficient data declares that insufficiency itself.
Operational findings
The rule catalogue runs over operational data. Every finding carries which rule and which row it came from, and the ruleset version is recorded alongside the output.
Cockpit
Findings gather on one screen. The cockpit is a summary layer and says so itself: it produces no new decision and does not reinterpret the findings beneath it.
Case queue
A finding becomes a case, gets an owner and is closed. Who did what and when remains in the audit trail.
Executive summary
The output that reaches management is produced without detaching from the evidence chain below it. A figure is shown only on an evidenced line.

See the evidence

You do not have to take POLİÇEK's word for it. Look at the evidence.

This card comes from a real, anonymised analysis. The top of the card is POLİÇEK's assessment; “See the evidence” opens what the document says — in English translation of the Turkish original.

Party affected: third party

A calculation method for the amount payable — the affected party is not the insured

Why it matters

This clause does not narrow the insured's own coverage; it sets the method for calculating the amount payable, and the affected party is the third party. The card says so in its sentence, on its badge and in its recommendation — conflating the two mechanisms sends the report in the wrong direction.

Evidence

Source: the official general terms the policy refers to

See the evidence

Where the third party's vehicle is repaired outside the approved network following an at-fault accident, approved-network discount rates are applied.

Location in the document: Compulsory Motor Third Party Liability General Terms · clause B.2.2.2

What POLİÇEK is not

The deliberate limits of the audit layer.

It does not decide in the auditor's place; the cockpit produces no new decision.
It writes no figure onto a line that has no evidence.
It is not a bookkeeping or tax-filing package.

Let us not tell you. Let us show you, on a policy.

Pick one of your insurance decisions. Ask POLİÇEK:

“What am I missing?”

Check your policy Try it on one of your decisions

No account yet? POLİÇEK accounts are opened by invitation. Request access

POLİÇEK — Before you decide. Decide with evidence.

A finding that cannot show its evidence is not a finding.

A figure detached from its source cannot be defended.

What you can do

Data and operations import

Operational findings

Cockpit

Case queue

Executive summary

You do not have to take POLİÇEK's word for it. Look at the evidence.

A calculation method for the amount payable — the affected party is not the insured

What POLİÇEK is not

Let us not tell you. Let us show you, on a policy.